Comparison between the orographic response
of the ECMWF model and the PYREX 1990 data
FRANCOIS LOTT
Quarterly
Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Volume:
121
Number:
526 Page: 1323 -- 1348, 1995. DOI:
10.1256/smsqj.52606.
Abstract
Recent
observations and analyses of the atmospheric flow in the vicinity of
the Pyrenees made during PYREX are compared with numerical experiments
carried out with the T213L31 European Centre for Medium-range Weather
Forecasts (ECMWF) global model. This study shows that the model
simulates a certain proportion of the measured pressure drag, but
always underestimates it. In the current model, this deficit is not
adequately made up by any of the parametrized subgrid-scale processes.
When the flow is along the range, the pressure-drag value depends on
the synoptic background flow structure. It is close to zero when the
flow impinging on the range is baroclinic. It is not zero when the
atmosphere is more barotropic (e.g. in the absence of any fronts) and
the model misses important lift processes. When the flow is normal to
the ridge, the model response to the mountain forcing is essentially
ageostrophic. In this case comparison between the vertical profiles of
the model stresses and the measured profile suggests that further drag
should be applied in the model at low level. This is supported by
comparisons of isentropic diagnostics, from the ECMWF model and the
French mesoscale model, Peridot. These diagnostics show that the ECMWF
model underestimates irreversible low-level processes, such as the flow
separation on the mountain flanks and the associated downstream wake,
which can be related to the drag. They also show that low-level
parametrized drags have a realistic impact on the model simulation of
the mountain wake This analysis supports the current development at the
ECMWF of a new subgrid-scale orographic drag scheme which parametrizes
the low-level impact of mesoscale mountains.
Back to François Lott Publications