Towards a general interface between land-surface schemes and general circulation
models
PILPS 4c
INTRODUCTION
The general interface for coupling land-surface scheme (LSSs) to general
circulation models (GCMs) proposed at the PILPS workshop (Melbourne June
1997) is only a first step towards achieving plug compatibility between
these complex models. The conventions proposed in the paper which came
out of the conference is only based on the knowledge of the participants
but no applications were available. For such a convention to be improved and ultimately
be adopted by a large community it needs to be tested in GCMs and LSSs
and the discussion needs to be continued and enriched by the day to day
experience. This Web page was setup to give a rapid access to the
newest developments of this interface and to open up the discussion to
a wider community.
This Web page will thus cover three topics :
-
Publications related to the general interface
-
GCMs or LSS which have implemented the interface
-
Topics under discussion
Publications
-
J.Polcher, B. McAvaney,P. Viterbo,M.-A.
Gaertner,A. Hahmann, J.-F. Mahfouf, J. Noilhan,T. Phillips, A. Pitman,C.A.
Schlosser,J.-P. Schulz,B. Timbal,D. Verseghy and Y. Xue (1998)
A proposal for a general interface between land-surface schemes and
general circulation models, Global and Planetary Change, 19 (1998) 261-276.
As a
PostScrip file (this is a more recent version than above).
Presentation
of the proposed general interface at the international workshop
on Technical
Aspects of Future Sea-Ice-Ocean-Atmosphere-Biosphere Coupling"
organized by CERFACS and FUJITSU (Toulouse, 19-20 October 2000).
Implementation of the interface
The general coupling method proposed during the PILPS 4c project needs
to be implemented in land-surface schemes and atmospheric models. This
is not a trivial issue as it adds the technical dimension to a complex
physical problem. Different groups have started to implement the
interface and they have followed slightly different routes. The two
known attempts are presented below.
Discussions on the advantages and problems with each will help us
improve both implementations. Later it will have to be be decided
which one should be adopted by future international inter-comparison
projects or if a combination of both should be developed.
Topics under discussion
-
Should the LSS or the GCM have the of sub-grid orography, knowing
that the orography is of the responsibility of the GCM?
Back to the PILPS homepage.
Back to the LMD-Homepage.
Jan Polcher
Last
modified: Wed Jan 7 19:06:50 MET 1998