next up previous contents
Next: 4.4 Comparing climate projections Up: 4 Comparing SimClimat to Previous: 4.2 How does a   Contents

4.3 Comparing the physical content

SimClimat has a much simpler physical content than the climate models participating in CMIP (table 2), which allows it to be much faster. It represents the atmosphere in a much coarser way (0D instead of 3D), but couples more components, notably the ice sheets and the carbon cycle. To this extent, it is rather analogous to a model Earth system (figure 15, purple frame). This allows SimClimat to represent climate changes at geological time scales.


Table 2: Table identifying the main differences between climate models participating in CMIP and SimClimat's physical model.

Models
Climate model participating in CMIP
SimClimat
Atmospheric grid dimension
3D
0D
Atmospheric and oceanic dynamics
yes
no
Time steps
a few seconds or minutes
several years
Radiation and Earth radiative balance
yes
very simple
Cloud effects
yes
no
Carbon cycle
no
yes
Ice sheets
no
yes
Uncertainty estimate
iner-model spread
no
Computational time for 100 years
several days
less than a second




Camille RISI 2023-07-24