Axial Atmospheric Angular Momentum Budget at Diurnal and Sub-Diurnal Periodicities

François Lott, Olivier deViron, Pedro Viterbo and François Vial

(pdf here)

   Journal of the Atmospheric, October 2007, In press

Summary:

The diurnal and sub-diurnal variations of the mass and wind terms of the axial Atmospheric Angular Momentum (AAM) are explored using a 1-year integration of the LMDz-GCM,  twelve 10-day ECMWF forecasts and some ECMWF Analysis products. In these datasets, the wind and mass AAMs present diurnal and semi-diurnal oscillations which tendencies far exceed the total torque.

In the LMDz-GCM, these diurnal and semi-diurnal oscillations are associated with axisymmetric (s=0) and barotropic circulation modes that resemble to the second gravest (n=2) Eigensolution of the Laplace's tidal equations. This mode induces a Coriolis conversion from the wind AAM toward the mass AAM that far exceeds the total torque.At the semi-diurnal period, this mode dominates the axisymmetric and barotropic circulation. At the diurnal period, this $n=2$ mode is also present, but the barotropic circulation also presents a mode resembling to the first gravest ($n=1$) Eigensolution of the tidal equations. This last mode does not produce anomalies in the mass and wind AAMs.

A shallow water axisymmetric model driven by zonal mean zonal forces which vertical integral equal the zonal mean zonal stresses  issued from the GCM is then used to interpret these results. This model reproduces  well the semi diurnal oscillations in mass and wind AAMs, and the semi-diurnal mode resembling to the n=2 Eigensolution that produces them,
when the forcing is distributed barotropically in the vertical direction. This model also reproduces diurnal modes resembling to the n=1 and n=2 Eigensolutions when the forcings are distributed more baroclinically. Among the dynamical forcings that produce these modes of motion, we found that the mountain forcing and the divergence of the AAM flux are equally important, and more efficient than the boundary layer friction.

In geodesy,  the large but opposite signals in the mass and wind AAMs due to the n=2 modes can lead to large errors in the evaluation of the AAM budget. The n=2  responses in surface pressure can affect the Earth Ellipcity, and the n=1 diurnal response can affect the geocenter position. For the surface pressure tide, our results suggest that the dynamical forcings of the zonal mean zonal flow are a potential cause for its $s=0$-component.

Back to François Lott publications list